Understanding the Impact of the September 30 NFIP Extension
September 30th, 2019
2 min read
By Chris Greene
In this podcast, we break down the September 30, 2019 extension of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and explain what it means for homeowners, buyers, and borrowers across the United States.
When the NFIP faces expiration, uncertainty can ripple through the real estate and lending markets. This short-term extension helped prevent disruptions, but it also highlighted ongoing challenges within the program.
Who Is Affected by the NFIP Extension?
The September 30 extension primarily affects two groups: current NFIP policyholders and individuals or businesses attempting to secure new flood insurance coverage.
Impact on Current NFIP Policyholders
For existing policyholders, the extension provided immediate relief. Policies scheduled to renew after September 30, 2019, were allowed to remain active rather than expiring. Without the extension, many property owners could have faced lapses in coverage, placing them at financial and lending risk.
This continuity was especially important for homeowners with federally backed mortgages, where flood insurance coverage is mandatory in designated flood zones.
.jpeg?width=314&name=download%20(8).jpeg)
New Policyholders
Impact on New NFIP Policyholders
The extension was even more critical for buyers and borrowers in the process of obtaining flood insurance for the first time. Without reauthorization, new NFIP policies could not be issued, which would have stalled many real estate transactions.
The level of impact varied depending on loan type.
FHA Loans
FHA-insured mortgages rely heavily on the NFIP, as it is often the only acceptable source of flood insurance for these loans. Without the extension, FHA loan closings could have been delayed or canceled entirely due to the lack of available flood coverage.
USDA Loans
USDA loans follow federal guidelines but gained additional flexibility as of July 1, 2019, when private flood insurance became an option. This reduced reliance on the NFIP and helped minimize disruption during short-term extensions, though underwriting timelines can still be lengthy.
VA Loans
VA loans, similar to USDA loans, also began allowing private flood insurance options in mid-2019. As a result, borrowers using VA financing were less impacted by the NFIP extension than in previous years.
Conventional Loans
Conventional residential loans experienced the least disruption. These loans have accepted private flood insurance for many years, making them largely unaffected by temporary NFIP extensions.
Commercial and SBA Loans
Commercial loans generally saw minimal impact; however, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans were an exception. SBA financing often requires flood insurance through the NFIP, meaning delays or coverage gaps could still occur without timely program extensions.

Why Short-Term Extensions Aren’t a Long-Term Solution
While the September 30 NFIP extension helped prevent immediate coverage disruptions, it did little to address the program’s long-term challenges. Outdated flood risk modeling, claims management issues, and funding limitations remain unresolved.
A multi-year reauthorization—ideally five years or longer—is necessary to modernize flood mapping, stabilize premiums, and improve the program’s financial sustainability.

Final Thoughts
The September 30 NFIP extension protected policyholders and kept real estate transactions moving, but it also underscored the need for lasting reform. Understanding how these extensions affect your loan, coverage options, and financial planning is critical—especially in high-risk flood zones.
.jpeg?width=404&name=download%20(5).jpeg)
If you have questions about how NFIP extensions impact your flood insurance, visit The Flood Insurance Guru, explore our educational videos on YouTube, or connect with us on Facebook for daily flood insurance insights.